首页> 外文OA文献 >Distancing and limited resourcefulness: Third sector service provision under austerity localism in the north east of England
【2h】

Distancing and limited resourcefulness: Third sector service provision under austerity localism in the north east of England

机译:距离遥远且资源匮乏:英格兰东北部地区在严峻的地方主义下提供第三部门服务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Drawing on the concept of ‘austerity localism’, (Featherstone et al., 2012) this paper explores the impact of recent spending cuts and a revitalisation of the localism agenda on the work of locally embedded third sector organisations who work with marginal communities in the north east of England. In three key areas there exists a problematic relationship between the progressive language of empowerment, as set out in contemporary localist discourse, and the experiences and perceptions of service providers and service users. These relate to involvement in decision-making processes about the allocation of squeezed funding; the ability and desirability of voluntary groups to become autonomous; and the restricted resourcefulness of third sector organisations in a context of austerity. What comes through our data in all these cases are forms of social and spatial distancing, between third sector organisations and local decision makers, between organisations and their service users and also across the sector itself. Such distancing is facilitated by contexts in which resources, trust and empathy are undermined. The paper concludes that understanding the challenges faced by marginalised communities, and the third sector agencies working with them, requires recognition of the existing capacities within places, the importance of situated power relationships as well as wider connections of dependence and responsibility.
机译:借鉴“紧缩性地方主义”的概念,(Featherstone等人,2012年),本文探讨了最近的支出削减和地方主义议程的振兴对与地方社区边缘社区合作的本地嵌入的第三部门组织的工作的影响。英格兰东北。在三个关键领域中,当代地方主义话语中所阐述的授权的渐进语言与服务提供商和服务使用者的经验和看法之间存在着问题性的关系。这些涉及参与有关压缩资金分配的决策过程;志愿团体自治的能力和愿望;在紧缩的背景下,第三部门组织的资源有限。在所有这些情况下,通过我们的数据得出的结果是,第三部门组织与本地决策者之间,组织与服务使用者之间以及整个部门本身之间的社会和空间隔离形式。在资源,信任和同理心受到破坏的情况下,这种疏离变得容易。本文的结论是,要了解边缘化社区以及与之合作的第三部门机构所面临的挑战,就需要认识到地方内部的现有能力,所处权力关系的重要性以及依赖和责任之间更广泛的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号